I am an atheist.
I wake up every morning, I go to my job. I work hard every day.
I am friendly and courteous to my co-workers.
I come home to wife every day. I have been married 25 years. I have three children and 3 grandchildren.
I have never been convicted of any crime or even arrested.
I have never taken any illegal drugs. (though I do have a problem with the drug laws in this country)
I pay my taxes and generally obey the law though of course, as we most all do, I may speed from time to time.
One time, this last Xmas season, I found a wallet with several hundred dollars in it as well as all the other things you would typically find in a wallet, and I returned it to the owner completely intact.
And remember, I am an atheist.
And yet a no less than a former president of the United States said this once, "...I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George H. W. Bush.
Is not that amazing, that despite all these things about me, this asshole thinks I should not be a citizen and also I cannot be a patriot? What kind of man is this? Has he not even read the very constitution that he swore to defend? The scary thing is that between this asshole and his son they were president for 12 years.
But he is just one example of the prejudice against atheists in this country, and it is, according to polls, very widespread. I wonder why this is?
Could it be that many religious people are actually pretty intolerant?
Yeah, I think that just may be it. And they teach this intolerance to their children.
To quote Kurt Vonnegut: "And so it goes..."
Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Saturday, March 27, 2010
I Was a Natural Born Skeptic
When I was very young, not even in elementary school yet, a little girl told me the story of the first man, Adam. I remember thinking at the time, how ridiculous it sounded. I thought she was crazy. I remember clearly thinking how nutty a concept it was that there even was a first man, and that we knew his name no less! I was definitely, at this point in my life, a skeptic.
But alas, my very non-skeptical father got a hold of me and set me on path to superstition. So much so that by the time I was in first grade I selected a book on the origin of life from the classroom bookshelf and it had a basic explanation of how life naturally arose in the seas. I had been so thoroughly indoctrinated by my father that I reacted as if I was reading porn, fascinated and yet feeling guilty at the same time.
By the time I was fifteen I was fairly brainwashed, writing in science class a description of how the Grand Canyon was formed by the draining of the land after the Flood of Noah. Sadly the teacher did me a disservice by not giving me an "F". I think she instead thought I was "creative" or something like that, a sad commentary on the quality of my science education, but I digress.
But fortunately chinks in the non-skeptical armor my father had so diligently outfitted me with began to appear though my interest in astronomy. I remember asking my not so wise father one time a very important question: "Dad, how can we see galaxies that are millions of light years away if the universe is only a few thousand years old?" His answer, if you know how to think like a creationist is entirely predictable. "Well Son, you see God in His infinite wisdom, when he created the galaxies, created the light in transit as well so that we could see the glories of his creation." This answer suited me at the time, but it also illustrates that I was thinking about the implications of what I was learning in my studies of astronomy. The skeptic in me was still alive deep down somewhere.
By the time I was nineteen, I had realized that my fathers explanation was really very inadequate, since this "stretched" light that he postulated contains within it the history of the universe that is object of the study of cosmology and it seemed to me that what the creator had really done 6000 years ago is create a full grown universe that actually looked billions of years old, in essence God had created time itself. This is the "appearance of age" theory of creation. At the time I thought I was somewhat clever for thinking of it, but I found out later it is actually a rather old idea and I was not so clever as I supposed, a very typical thing for us to discover as we mature in life, but again, I digress.
I went through a "cult" phase and what critical thinking skills I did have left took a severe pounding but actually they did also get some practice as I heard the cult leader, 0n different occasions, make mistakes. Let me tell you, cult leaders typically don't like being confronted with facts that get in the way of a point they are trying to make. Quite frankly, I had no business being in this cult, I was never really one of them, but I had my father to thank for being in there the first place so there ya go.
I came out of the other side of the cult and began to think about the implications of my "appearance of age" theory of the universe. I asked myself a fundamental question: "From an observational point of view what was the difference between a universe that "appears" to be billions of years old and one that actually is?" The obvious answer of course is "none at all" and it was at this point that I became what is known as an old earth creationist. Which meant that I now had to try force the bible to conform to reality instead of the other way around.
At this point in my life, with skepticism always bubbling at the surface of my thinking, it of course was only a matter of time before my christian beleifs became a target. I just quite frankly as I was in church one day became very skeptical of the entire thing, Jesus, the bible, the whole shebang shall we say.
So I thought to myself, that if all these things are true, then it will not hurt one bit to subject them to some intense critical analysis. They will be all the more strengthened by my study and my faith would be stronger than ever. Of course the converse being true as well, if they prove false, then I will be that much better off for having rid myself of some very burdensome beleifs that had not stood the test of a true skeptical analysis.
Now for you skeptical readers of course you know what happened next. In my studies and my effort to prove Christianity, I failed spectacularly and as a result my faith in the bible as the inspired word of God collapsed and that God that I had believed in literally vanished from my mind. I was finally where I was supposed to be, where I had been destined to be, a true skeptic. And an atheist too of course.
But alas, my very non-skeptical father got a hold of me and set me on path to superstition. So much so that by the time I was in first grade I selected a book on the origin of life from the classroom bookshelf and it had a basic explanation of how life naturally arose in the seas. I had been so thoroughly indoctrinated by my father that I reacted as if I was reading porn, fascinated and yet feeling guilty at the same time.
By the time I was fifteen I was fairly brainwashed, writing in science class a description of how the Grand Canyon was formed by the draining of the land after the Flood of Noah. Sadly the teacher did me a disservice by not giving me an "F". I think she instead thought I was "creative" or something like that, a sad commentary on the quality of my science education, but I digress.
But fortunately chinks in the non-skeptical armor my father had so diligently outfitted me with began to appear though my interest in astronomy. I remember asking my not so wise father one time a very important question: "Dad, how can we see galaxies that are millions of light years away if the universe is only a few thousand years old?" His answer, if you know how to think like a creationist is entirely predictable. "Well Son, you see God in His infinite wisdom, when he created the galaxies, created the light in transit as well so that we could see the glories of his creation." This answer suited me at the time, but it also illustrates that I was thinking about the implications of what I was learning in my studies of astronomy. The skeptic in me was still alive deep down somewhere.
By the time I was nineteen, I had realized that my fathers explanation was really very inadequate, since this "stretched" light that he postulated contains within it the history of the universe that is object of the study of cosmology and it seemed to me that what the creator had really done 6000 years ago is create a full grown universe that actually looked billions of years old, in essence God had created time itself. This is the "appearance of age" theory of creation. At the time I thought I was somewhat clever for thinking of it, but I found out later it is actually a rather old idea and I was not so clever as I supposed, a very typical thing for us to discover as we mature in life, but again, I digress.
I went through a "cult" phase and what critical thinking skills I did have left took a severe pounding but actually they did also get some practice as I heard the cult leader, 0n different occasions, make mistakes. Let me tell you, cult leaders typically don't like being confronted with facts that get in the way of a point they are trying to make. Quite frankly, I had no business being in this cult, I was never really one of them, but I had my father to thank for being in there the first place so there ya go.
I came out of the other side of the cult and began to think about the implications of my "appearance of age" theory of the universe. I asked myself a fundamental question: "From an observational point of view what was the difference between a universe that "appears" to be billions of years old and one that actually is?" The obvious answer of course is "none at all" and it was at this point that I became what is known as an old earth creationist. Which meant that I now had to try force the bible to conform to reality instead of the other way around.
At this point in my life, with skepticism always bubbling at the surface of my thinking, it of course was only a matter of time before my christian beleifs became a target. I just quite frankly as I was in church one day became very skeptical of the entire thing, Jesus, the bible, the whole shebang shall we say.
So I thought to myself, that if all these things are true, then it will not hurt one bit to subject them to some intense critical analysis. They will be all the more strengthened by my study and my faith would be stronger than ever. Of course the converse being true as well, if they prove false, then I will be that much better off for having rid myself of some very burdensome beleifs that had not stood the test of a true skeptical analysis.
Now for you skeptical readers of course you know what happened next. In my studies and my effort to prove Christianity, I failed spectacularly and as a result my faith in the bible as the inspired word of God collapsed and that God that I had believed in literally vanished from my mind. I was finally where I was supposed to be, where I had been destined to be, a true skeptic. And an atheist too of course.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Why are Christians so worried about Atheists?
Or in other words, "Why do Christians have such a hard on for Atheists." As an ex-Christian I remember quite a few former enemies. We did not like the JW's very much. We didn't think much of the Mormons either. (Sorry, Mitt.) We thought New Agers were freaks. We thought that all these groups were guilty of what Paul outlines in Galatians about the "other gospel." He condemns the teachers of other gospels in very strong terms.
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." Gal. 1:8
In the light of this message from Paul, you would think that Christians would spend most of their efforts on the ones guilty of this crime.
Atheists on the other hand, do not preach another gospel. We don't preach any "gospel" at all. No one is going to be fooled by us. Our position is very clear and straightforward. Those who believe the bible has supernatural origins and are in search of an explanation of its contents are far more susceptible to deception by Mormons, JW's, etc., than to little old us. We aren't going door to door. So why do Christians feel so threatened by atheism?
Well, I don't have all the answers, but I think there are two main reasons:
1. They misunderstand us. I heard an Atheist hater on CNN describe Atheists as believers in nothing, and she did not mean it as a compliment. Yeah, that's the ticket. We Atheist's believe in absolutely nothing. Case closed.
2. They are fighting secularism and atheism is seen as going hand in hand. I am not going to go into detail but you know what I am talking about. Ever since Darwin everything has been going to hell in a hand basket and the Church has been threatened with hundreds of -isms. Atheism is seen as the root cause. This seems to be another thing they misunderstand.
Christians should really actually be very appreciative of Atheists for our honesty. We are not like the liberal Christians who want to eat their cake and have it too. They still want to go to church and sing in the choir but they have watered the bible down more to their tastes and thrown out unappetizing doctrines like hell and original sin. Yet, they somehow manage to convince themselves that they are believers in Paul. I'm honest, I don't twist Paul's words. I believe that Paul meant what he said in the epistle to the Romans. I just think he's full of shit.
This will be one of the main themes of this blog, exploring what I perceive to be a fascination and obsession by some Christians over Atheists.
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." Gal. 1:8
In the light of this message from Paul, you would think that Christians would spend most of their efforts on the ones guilty of this crime.
Atheists on the other hand, do not preach another gospel. We don't preach any "gospel" at all. No one is going to be fooled by us. Our position is very clear and straightforward. Those who believe the bible has supernatural origins and are in search of an explanation of its contents are far more susceptible to deception by Mormons, JW's, etc., than to little old us. We aren't going door to door. So why do Christians feel so threatened by atheism?
Well, I don't have all the answers, but I think there are two main reasons:
1. They misunderstand us. I heard an Atheist hater on CNN describe Atheists as believers in nothing, and she did not mean it as a compliment. Yeah, that's the ticket. We Atheist's believe in absolutely nothing. Case closed.
2. They are fighting secularism and atheism is seen as going hand in hand. I am not going to go into detail but you know what I am talking about. Ever since Darwin everything has been going to hell in a hand basket and the Church has been threatened with hundreds of -isms. Atheism is seen as the root cause. This seems to be another thing they misunderstand.
Christians should really actually be very appreciative of Atheists for our honesty. We are not like the liberal Christians who want to eat their cake and have it too. They still want to go to church and sing in the choir but they have watered the bible down more to their tastes and thrown out unappetizing doctrines like hell and original sin. Yet, they somehow manage to convince themselves that they are believers in Paul. I'm honest, I don't twist Paul's words. I believe that Paul meant what he said in the epistle to the Romans. I just think he's full of shit.
This will be one of the main themes of this blog, exploring what I perceive to be a fascination and obsession by some Christians over Atheists.
Labels:
Atheism,
Christians,
Paul the Apostle,
Romans,
Secularism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
